bearlog - Latest Comments in Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

craigs2 — Thu, 28 May 2009 23:35:43 -0000

Some good points raised in that post. Will be back to check for more.

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

cicurug — Fri, 01 May 2009 23:28:51 -0000

congrats man, great work

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

Pemilu Indonesia 2009 — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:14:14 -0000

now i find what i want to know.. thank you..

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

belajarseo — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:10:28 -0000

congrats for this great work.

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

rahach — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:24:32 -0000

good job dude, thank you.

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

bear — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:21:21 -0000

Julien,

The biggest hurdle was finding out that different folks implement specs differently and that there wasn't a single suite of tests to compare server performance with. So we spent quite a bit of time working with the Tigase guys in getting them to probably 98% complient with the spec.

The other issue is a complete lack of docs or examples of what goes into maintaining all but the most simple of PubSub structures. Not to say the information isn't out there, it's just wasn't helpful to our needs - most folks only use the PEP part of PubSub.

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

julien51 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:58:25 -0000

Hey Bear, I'd love to know a little bit more about the problems you had with PubSub. We have released our XMPP API (with PubSub flavor) : http://groups.google.com/group/notifixious-deve...

We actually "cheat" by not using existing PubSub components... but "faking" it with an external "home-made" component that outputs PubSub syntax...
Feel free to give a look ad let us know what you think!

Re: Seesmic and XMPP Pubsub

loiclemeur — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:36:07 -0000

congrats for the end-to-end test :) let's take it to our users! Rockon.