<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>bearlog - Latest Comments in scaling questions and issues</title><link>http://bearlog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:28:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: scaling questions and issues</title><link>http://code-bear.com/bearlog/2008/01/18/scaling-questions-and-issues/#comment-305288</link><description>We are fighting mutlipe deadlines, RabbitMQ is still in use on the test box but due to reasons that are not RabbitMQ's fault at all we are still stuck with ActiveMQ :(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll have to take a look at the updated client list - that may give me some more info to pass to the devs to speed up the replacement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bear</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: scaling questions and issues</title><link>http://code-bear.com/bearlog/2008/01/18/scaling-questions-and-issues/#comment-303971</link><description>Hi there - RabbitMQ here :-)  How are you guys getting on with this?  We have some users and customers who are implementing the use case you describe.  Also, more client languages are now supported.  Please feel free to get in touch if you like!  Cheers, alexis</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alexis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>