<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bearlog - Latest Comments in Federating with Wave Sandbox</title><link>http://bearlog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bearlog.disqus.com/federating_with_wave_sandbox/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:38:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Federating with Wave Sandbox</title><link>http://code-bear.com/bearlog/2009/11/02/federating-with-wave-sandbox/#comment-24108946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. I really need to take some time and polish up the work i've done testing against FedOne using clients other than Google's so us protocol and wire folk can get a feel on how hard/painful this is going to be to implement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the nudge!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bear</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federating with Wave Sandbox</title><link>http://code-bear.com/bearlog/2009/11/02/federating-with-wave-sandbox/#comment-24108517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good stuff, looking forward to a distributed protocol for social web &amp;amp; collaboration. Nicely done Bear.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Essel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federating with Wave Sandbox</title><link>http://code-bear.com/bearlog/2009/11/02/federating-with-wave-sandbox/#comment-21698031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Misspellings and all! W00t!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:49:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>